I have never tried the “freecasting” method. I am curious as to how it affects game balance….and if your wizards complain about it.
Considering that priest spells are mostly defensive, healing and supportive (buffing, if you will), the way I see it, it puts the cleric on a par with the wizard.
I was thinking along those lines myself. The cleric/priest is getting his/her spells from a higher power, and should just pray for them as they cast them. The wizard studies, the priest prays.
I think it makes sense, I may have to try it in my campaign, just to see how it works and if it is balanced.
No issues with it I’ve ran into yet. Wizards don’t really have too much to complain about either. Priests aren’t receiving any more spells than they normally would using this system, and as a matter of fact, if a priest happens to get carried away or is needed to cast the bulk of their spells in the morning, guess who the party is going to be looking to for magic solutions? If anything, freecasting forces players of priests to be more conscientious of the spells they cast and when they choose to cast them. A character that suffers a scratch or two in a battle might not need a cure to be cast; healing NWP might be enough, for example. The priest player needs to recognize that and determine when his or her spells are most needed.
After I posted, I was thinking along the same lines as what you posted. The more careful casting of spells. It would be very easy to cast your daily number of spells rather quickly if not chosen wisely.
A very similar system to ‘Freecasing’ is already covered by several options in the 2E Player’s Option books.
You must be logged in to comment. Login / Register
Amen! Preach on, brother!